At last after 8 years Roman Abramovic has the championship trophy
that he wanted so badly. This Champions League title ratifies his investment
and gives Chelsea a tangible reason to claim a spot among the “big clubs” of
Europe. Just like the Europa League, the winner of this Champions League was
the club that not many would have guessed back in December. An impeccable
defensive order and a sublime Drogba carried them throughout the tournament
allowing them to defeat every team that, on paper at least, was better than
Chelsea.
Is there merit in what they did? Absolutely. I won’t be the one to
say that they don’t deserve the title. This team walked on the tight rope at
all phases of this championship and yet they never gave up. They capitalized in
the very few chances they created. There is merit in that. However, I can never
support anti-football: the art of not wanting to go for the victory. Inter did
it two years ago, Greece did it in the Eurocup 2004 and now Chelsea has done it
too. They all have won without attempting to win but rather focusing in not
losing.
Chelsea display in the final was horrible in my opinion. It feels
more like Bayern lost rather than Chelsea won.
Compare their display to Barcelona last year or compare them to the Real
Madrid team that won the 9th Champions League 10 years ago. It
almost a sin to play like Chelsea did. In fact, the real sin is that Chelsea,
until the 1-0, did not want to play. Two defensive lines of 4 and 5 players
respectively at the grandest stage in European football is something I don’t
expect from a team that wants to be crowned “the best”.
Listen to what Mata, Torres, Di Matteo, and other players were saying
at the end of the game about how Bayern played better and you can see even they
know luck was a huge element in their title win. Again, I think that “never
give up” attitude is fantastic but to renounce any effort to go an win the game
is not a good thing for a club that wants to enter into that “best clubs of
Europe” category.
That football philosophy is valid sure but 8/10 times you will be
eliminated by a team that wants to play for the win. If you want proof of this
just look where Chelsea ended in the Premier League: in a Europa League place
where their game belongs. I’m not saying that defensive football is a bad thing
or that it isn’t valid. But being a defensive team doesn’t mean that you have
to forget about attacking.
I doubt any good midfielder or striker who’s looking to play in
another club would dream about playing for Chelsea, at least Di Matteo’s
Chelsea. How could they? No striker wants to spend the whole game alone waiting
for a long pass, a bad defense, and luck to score a goal. No midfielder wants
to be constantly playing in a center-back role just to get the ball and have
nobody to make a pass. Even as a fan, I would rather pay to see Arsenal or
Tottenham play before paying to see Chelsea.
The funny thing is that Chelsea deserved this title long ago but won
it when they least played for it. However, I will give credit where credit is
due. Both, Drogba and Cech, were out of this world. That header from Didier was
one of the best headers I’ve seen. They alone won this cup for Chelsea. The years will pass and this final will be
remembered for the wrong reasons. It will be the final that Bayern Munich
couldn’t win, or lost to Chelsea.
No comments:
Post a Comment